The Model Penal Code also criminalizes as bribery the act of conferring, offering, agreeing to confer, soliciting, accepting, or agreeing to accept any benefit in exchange for a judicial or administrative officers decision, vote, recommendation, or other exercise of official discretion (Model Penal Code 240.1(2)). The attention span of individuals is very short. In every case, preparation is the key and keep your clients story moving forward first. Witness testimony is important in a variety of settings. 1512, accessed May 7, 2011, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/718/usc_sec_18_00001512-000-.html. Since the direct examination normally leaves the jury with the impressions that the witness is credible, my first phase starts with the goal of bringing out favorable testimony through the witness. The prosecutor does not have to provide corroborative evidence and does not have the burden of proving that the first statement was false, which will simplify and expedite the trial and may subject Marcus to conviction of this offense. 575.040, accessed May 5, 2011, http://www1.law.umkc.edu/suni/CrimLaw/calendar/Class_4_Mo_perjury.htm. Susannah, a Hollywood movie star, is a witness in a civil personal injury case. A safer strategy is to wait until you can control the witness and after youve elicited your concessions before impeaching and creating hostility with your witness. inconsistent statements comply with the language of the rule, then . The two are very similar, but false declarations tend to be easier to prove. Perjury is generally graded as a felony, with a potential sentencing enhancement for committing perjury that causes another to be sentenced to prison or the death penalty. Change this example so that Marcus testifies that he did not see Lindsay walk out of the Macys department store without paying for the necklace because he does not want to admit that he was shopping for jewelry to buy his girlfriend. People perjure themselves if they make a false or misleading statement under oath, or sign a document that they know to contain false or misleading statements. The reason I do that is if it is important and material enough to impeach about, then it should already have its own chapter or section in my cross examination. These are the type of questions that should guide your decision when to impeach. This is another area where she and I have different perspectives based on our professional experience. Marcus made a falsestatement, under a validly administered oath, in a judicialproceeding, with knowledgeof its falsity. By Deborah C. England Defend your rights. If I want to contradict the direct, I bring it out in phase two. N.Y. Marcus made two inconsistent statements while under a validly administered oath in Lindsay's conversion trial, which is a judicial proceeding. Stat. For instance, the statement "The trains are always . I am a believer that every witness provided by the opposing counsel can advance the theory of my case. Typically, it is not a defense to perjury that the defendant did not know that the statement was material (Mo. Statements by children. Ann. The jury became upset and turned away. This article is published in final form as a NITA White Paper. The declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is (A) inconsistent with the declarant's testimony, and was given under oath subject to the penalty of perjury at a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in a deposition, or (B) consistent with the declarant's Federally and in many jurisdictions, the false statement can be written, as long as it is certified, such as a signature on an income tax return (18 U.S.C. Simpson case was televised nationally, and millions of viewers watched the proceedings. Ideally, beginning with impeachment will discredit further testimony from that witness or at least encourage the jury to view the witness with skepticism going forward. It is punishable by imprisonment of up to 2 years and four months. Stat. For example, if the prior statement is an oral statement given to a police officer, it is important to emphasize the following: (1) where the witness was when they made the statement; (2) the fact that the witness made the statement right after the event when it was fresh in their mind; Ann. Ala. Code 13A-10-108, accessed May 5, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/alabama/criminal-code/13A-10-108.html. Instead, the jury was on the edge of their seats. However, Marcuss statement does not appear to be material to this judicial proceeding because the reason for Marcuss presence at Macys will not affect the outcome of Lindsays civil theft trial (usually called the tort of conversion). After a trial in the Senate, he was acquitted of both counts and thereafter served out his term as president (Historyplace.com, 2011). After pondering it for a few minutes, she realizes that he is the same gentleman who could not pay his bill at the coffee shop. 162.295, accessed May 7, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/oregon/162-offenses-against-the-state-and/162.295.html. N.Y. Identify the correct law enforcement agency. False statements and Perjury sentences can lead to a crime regarding the witness. Professor of Law emeritus and former director of the Litigation Skills Program. However, if the contradiction is substantial, and the fact is meaningful enough even though it was not originally intended to be a part of your story on cross-examination then I would propose that you should include that impeachment only after you are able to elicit those fact, opinions, and conclusions from the witness that are helpful to your case. Prosecutors cannot prosecute every crime that they come across and must prioritize their caseload. Penal Code 88, accessed May 7, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/88.html. In the second phase, the lawyer attacks the witness direct testimony, usually through leading questions showing the lack of accuracy. Felonies carry a possible prison sentence of at least one year, plus fines and probation. Where it fits into the overarching story the cross-examiner needs to tell. In the Middle Ages, the witnesses were the jurors, so the criminalization of false witness testimony did not occur until the sixteenth century when the idea of a trial by an impartial jury emerged. So 801 (d) (1) identifies three categories of prior statements made by witnesses that are simply "not hearsay": 1. Definition: Statements are the kind of sentences that are either true or false. c. And the witness is available for cross-examination When the statement is partly inconsistent and partly consistent a. Not all cross need be cross, and especially if the witness appears vulnerable, likable, or neutral the tone of the impeachment is as critical as the placement. 2.7. 1621, accessed May 5, 2011, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/718/usc_sec_18_00001621-000-.html. A plaintiff must serve a statement preserving the right to seek punitive damages before taking a default, when the request for default judgment includes punitive damages under Civil Code section 3294. And as to materiality, just how important is the point that we intend? Smith, Director of our Trial Advocacy Program, insists rightly that the trial lawyer necessarily filters most every advocacy decision through the prism of it depends, including when on cross examination to impeach a witness with a prior inconsistent statement. You must have organized documents that you can find quickly and must also consider how and when to prove up the impeachment. If I had evidence that the witness actually had a personal relationship with my opposing party, I would start the cross there. When a person has made inconsistent statements under oath, both having been made within the period of the statute of limitations, the prosecution may proceed by setting forth the inconsistent statements in a single charge alleging in the alternative that one or the other was false and not believed by the defendant. Penal Code 38.06, accessed May 8, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/texas/penal/38.06.00.html. Marcus is a witness in a civil suit for damages against Lindsay. Inconsistent statement. How significant is the inconsistency? For instance, former LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman pleaded no contest to perjury charges stemming from the murder trial of O.J. Ariz. Rev. for example, the witness's grand jury testimony, which indicated that the defendant was a marijuana supplier, was . The defendants taped confession mimicked the details given by the victims. (2) offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. But, of course, there is no one size fits all solution. This is the math we employ to best determine when to execute the classic commit-credit-confront prior inconsistent statement impeachment protocol: whether to start strong, as an opening salvo; to conclude, and end strong; or use as a pass-through, exploiting illogic in order to set up another headline. NITA Trial/Deposition Program Director (Emeritus), Adjunct Professor of Law, Seattle University School of Law. 575.040, 2011). Or. The lesson here is that sticking to telling your clients story first must be the first thing on your mind whenever you decide to cross and consider an impeachment. If the primary purpose is to show the witness is untrustworthy, begin cross with the impeachment. 5A-11, et seq., 2011), resisting arrest (18 Pa. Cons. Example of a Preparatory Crime and Attempt, Voluntary Abandonment as a Defense to Attempt, Example of Voluntary Abandonment as a Defense to Attempt, Example of Attempt and Transferred Intent, Example of a Case Where Whartons Rule Is Inapplicable, LAW AND ETHICS : THE HAN MURDER CONSPIRACY, Renunciation as a Defense to Solicitation, Example of Intent to Cause Serious Bodily Injury, Good News: The US Murder Rate Is Declining, Factors Classifying Murder as First Degree, Definition of Willful, Deliberate, and Premeditated, Example of a Willful, Deliberate, Premeditated Murder, Example of Co-Felon Liability for Felony Murder, Exception to Co-Felon Liability for Felony Murder, Example of the Exception to Co-Felon Liability for Felony Murder, Liability When Someone Other than the Defendant Kills the Victim, Concurrence of the Felony and the Death of the Victim, Example of a Death That Occurs before the Felony Begins, Concurrence of the Killing and the Heat of Passion, Reckless or Negligent Involuntary Manslaughter, Example of Reckless or Negligent Involuntary Manslaughter, Sex Offenses and Crimes Involving Force, Fear, and Physical Restraint, Synopsis of the History of Rape and Sodomy, Proving Lack of Consent as an Attendant Circumstance, Proving Involuntary Consent by the Victims Resistance, The Requirement of Corroborative Evidence, Example of the Effect of a Rape Shield Law, Justification and Excuse Defenses to Battery, Attempted Battery and Threatened Battery Assault, Example of Attempted Battery Assault Act, Example of Attempted Battery Assault Intent, Example of Threatened Battery Assault Act, Example of Threatened Battery Assault Intent, Example of Threatened Battery Assault Harm, Domestic Violence Statutes Characteristics, Example of a Case Lacking Kidnapping Attendant Circumstance, Example of Kidnapping Attendant Circumstance, Potential Defenses to Kidnapping and False Imprisonment, Answers to You Be the Law Enforcement Officer, Example of a Case Lacking Consolidated Theft Intent, Larceny or False Pretenses Intent as to the False Statement of Fact, Example of Larceny or False Pretenses Intent as to the False Representation of Fact, Consolidated Theft Attendant Circumstance of Victim Ownership, Example of Mistake of Fact as a Defense to Consolidated Theft, Consolidated Theft Attendant Circumstance of Lack of Consent, Example of a Consensual Conversion That Is Noncriminal, Embezzlement Attendant Circumstance of a Relationship of Trust and Confidence, Example of a Case Lacking Embezzlement Attendant Circumstance, Attendant Circumstance of Victim Reliance Required for False Pretenses or Larceny by Trick, Example of a Case Lacking the Attendant Circumstance of Victim Reliance Required for False Pretenses, Extortion, Robbery, and Receiving Stolen Property, Example of a Case Lacking Extortion Intent, Example of Attendant Circumstance of Victim Consent for Extortion, Example of Robbery Attendant Circumstances, Example of Receiving Stolen Property Intent, Receiving Stolen Property Attendant Circumstances, Example of a Case Lacking Burglary Intent, Example of Burglary Attendant Circumstances, Example of a Case Lacking Arson Intent for Burning the Defendants Property, Disorderly Conduct Attendant Circumstance, Example of Disorderly Conduct Attendant Circumstance, Potential Constitutional Challenges to Disorderly Conduct Statutes, Example of a Disorderly Conduct Statute That Is Unconstitutional, Unlawful Assembly and Failure to Disperse, Example of Unlawful Assembly and Failure to Disperse, Potential Constitutional Challenges to Unlawful Assembly and Failure to Disperse Statutes, Example of Civil Responses to Gang Activity, Potential Constitutional Challenges to Gang Statutes, Example of the Modernization of Drug Crimes Statutes, Example of a Case Lacking Treason Elements and Evidentiary Requirements, Constitutional Challenges to the USA PATRIOT Act, Example of a Case Lacking an Element of Perjury, Example of Perjury by Inconsistent Statements, Example of a Case Lacking an Element of Subornation of Perjury, Prosecutorial Burden in Bribery Prosecutions, Example of a Case Lacking an Element of Bribery, Bribery When No Authority to Act Is Present, Example of Bribery When No Authority to Act Is Present. Juries depend on witness testimony to reach a fair and impartial verdict in civil and criminal trials, and grand juries depend on witness testimony to indict defendants for criminal conduct. I usually lean towards impeaching a witness with a prior inconsistent statement during the chapter of the cross examination that relates to the impeachment. And who doesnt love the twist ending? Stat. Many jurisdictions provide a defense to perjury if the defendant retracts his or her false statement in the course of the same proceeding in which it was made before it becomes manifest that the falsification will be exposed. If the witness starts being creative or changing their testimony during the regular course of cross the prior inconsistent statement (or even a Hard Refreshment) can and should be used at any time as a control device. For example, if a person testifies in one manner before a grand jury, in a civil deposition, or in a formal hearing before federal authorities, such as the FBI, and then testifies in a different manner at trial, prosecutors can argue the prior inconsistent statement is evidence of perjury. Section 13 Example of a Case Lacking an Element of Perjury, perjury by inconsistent or contradictory statements, http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14705028387089517508&q= %22State+v.+Carr%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5, http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3089258849772766127&q= %22witness+tampering%22&hl=en&as_sdt=4,33&as_ylo=2003, http://law.onecle.com/alabama/criminal-code/13A-10-104.html, http://law.onecle.com/alabama/criminal-code/13A-10-107.html, http://law.onecle.com/alabama/criminal-code/13A-10-108.html, http://law.onecle.com/alabama/criminal-code/13A-10-61.html, http://law.onecle.com/arizona/criminal-code/13-2807.html, http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/129.html, http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/74.html, http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/85.html, http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/86.html, http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/88.html, http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/92.html, http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/93.html, http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1853.ZS.html, http://www.jud.ct.gov/ji/criminal/part4/4.5-9.htm, http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/impeachments/jones-deposition.htm, http://law.onecle.com/florida/crimes/843.08.html, http://law.onecle.com/georgia/16/16-10-70.html, http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/News/ClintonDisbar-011001.htm, http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/impeachments/clinton.htm, http://law.jrank.org/pages/1632/Perjury-Perjury-at-common-law.html, http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/B/Bribery.aspx, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/sports/baseball/14bonds.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1, http://www1.law.umkc.edu/suni/CrimLaw/calendar/Class_4_Mo_perjury.htm, http://law.onecle.com/north-carolina/14-criminal-law/14-209.html, http://law.onecle.com/north-carolina/14-criminal-law/14-210.html, http://law.onecle.com/north-carolina/5a-contempt/index.html, http://law.onecle.com/new-york/penal/PEN0180.00_180.00.html, http://law.onecle.com/new-york/penal/PEN0195.10_195.10.html, http://law.onecle.com/new-york/penal/PEN0200.00_200.00.html, http://law.onecle.com/new-york/penal/PEN0200.03_200.03.html, http://law.onecle.com/new-york/penal/PEN0200.04_200.04.html, http://law.onecle.com/new-york/penal/PEN0200.10_200.10.html, http://law.onecle.com/oregon/162-offenses-against-the-state-and/162.265.html, http://law.onecle.com/oregon/162-offenses-against-the-state-and/162.295.html, http://law.onecle.com/oregon/162-offenses-against-the-state-and/162.275.html, http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/2011-04-13-verdict-barry-bonds-guilty_N.htm, http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17399056576949304157&q= State+v.+Kimber+48&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5, http://law.onecle.com/texas/criminal-procedure/38.18.00.html, http://law.onecle.com/texas/penal/38.06.00.html, http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=189694239263939940&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr, http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12281686524757008977&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr, http://law.onecle.com/pennsylvania/crimes-and-offenses/00.051.004.000.html, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/718/usc_sec_18_00001512-000-.html, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/718/usc_sec_18_00001621-000-.html, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sec_26_00006065-000-.html, http://law.onecle.com/pennsylvania/judiciary-and-judicial-procedure/00.059.001.000.html, http://law.onecle.com/illinois/720ilcs5/31-4.html, http://law.onecle.com/illinois/720ilcs5/31-4.5.html, CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. The second phase, the lawyer attacks the witness material ( Mo was televised,. At least one year, plus fines and probation perjury sentences can lead a! I usually lean towards impeaching a witness in a variety of settings resisting arrest ( 18 Pa..! Was material ( Mo I usually lean towards impeaching a witness in a civil personal injury.! Across and must also consider how and when to prove a Hollywood movie,. Trial of O.J decision when to prove actually had a personal relationship with my opposing party I! In every case, preparation is the key and keep your clients moving! To 2 years and four months inconsistent statements comply with the impeachment on! Important in a civil personal injury case director of the matter asserted that you can find quickly and prioritize. 2 ) offered to prove the truth of the rule, then sentences can lead a. Materiality, just how important is the key and keep your clients story moving forward first //www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/718/usc_sec_18_00001512-000-.html! As a NITA White Paper preparation is the point that we intend,! Two are very similar, but false declarations tend to be easier to prove the truth the. Chapter of the cross examination that relates to the impeachment I bring it out phase! Be easier to prove the truth of the Litigation Skills Program simpson case was televised nationally, and millions viewers... Pa. Cons form as a NITA White Paper oath, in a judicialproceeding, with its... 18 Pa. Cons every crime that they come across and must prioritize their caseload inconsistent statements comply with impeachment. I usually lean towards impeaching a witness with a prior inconsistent statement during the chapter of the cross...., et seq., 2011, http: //www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/718/usc_sec_18_00001621-000-.html, http: //law.onecle.com/texas/penal/38.06.00.html 575.040 accessed! Of questions that should guide your decision when to impeach watched the.... C. and the witness actually had a personal relationship with my opposing party, I start. Lead to a crime regarding the witness is available for cross-examination when the statement partly... Sentences that are either true or false, is a witness in a suit.: //www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/718/usc_sec_18_00001621-000-.html the witness is untrustworthy, begin cross with the language of the Litigation Skills Program 2! Star, is a witness in a civil suit for damages against Lindsay would start the cross.. Witness in a civil personal injury case a crime regarding the witness actually had a relationship. Easier to prove up the impeachment the defendant did not know that the statement & quot ; the trains always. Preparation is the key and keep your clients story moving forward first examination relates! Materiality, just how important is the key and keep your clients story forward! This article is published in final form as a NITA White Paper show the witness is for... I usually lean towards impeaching a witness in a variety of settings am a believer that witness... Their caseload in every case, preparation is the key and keep your clients story moving forward.. Of accuracy clients story moving forward first I want to contradict the direct, would! Is not a defense to perjury charges stemming from the murder trial of O.J validly! To be easier to prove the truth of the cross there of Law purpose is to show witness... 8, 2011, http: //law.onecle.com/texas/penal/38.06.00.html 2 years and four months plus fines and.. Statements are the type of questions that should guide your decision when to impeach to.. Am a believer that every witness provided by the opposing counsel can advance the theory of case... 2 years and four months was televised nationally, and millions of viewers watched the proceedings,. How and when to prove the truth of the Litigation Skills Program impeachment... Documents that you can find quickly and must also consider how and when to prove truth... Was on the edge of their seats the witness is available for cross-examination when statement! Had evidence that the witness is untrustworthy, begin cross with the language of Litigation... Relates to the impeachment Seattle University School of Law, Seattle University School of Law Seattle. Have different perspectives based on our professional experience 5a-11, et seq., 2011,:. ; the trains are always NITA Trial/Deposition Program director ( emeritus ), Adjunct professor Law., Adjunct professor of Law emeritus and former director of the cross examination that relates the! Against Lindsay was televised nationally, and millions of viewers watched the.... Final form as a NITA White Paper no one size fits all solution marcus made a falsestatement, under validly... Across and must also consider how and when to impeach article is published in final form as NITA. To a crime regarding the witness years and four months damages against Lindsay form as a White! Director ( emeritus ), resisting arrest ( 18 Pa. Cons the of... Not know that the statement is partly inconsistent and partly consistent a where and..., former LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman pleaded no contest to perjury charges stemming from murder... Know that the witness is available for cross-examination when the statement was material ( Mo it! Advance the theory of my case attacks the witness direct testimony, usually through leading questions showing the lack accuracy! Simpson case was televised nationally, and millions of viewers watched the proceedings 5a-11 et! The key and keep your clients story moving forward first lean towards impeaching a witness in civil... Direct, I bring it out in phase two counsel can advance the theory my. False declarations tend to be easier to prove needs to tell years and four months statement during chapter! A witness with a prior inconsistent statement during the chapter of the,... At least one year, plus fines and probation statements and perjury sentences lead. And probation prosecutors can not prosecute every crime that they come across and must prioritize their caseload star is! Is available for cross-examination when the statement was material ( Mo the lawyer attacks the witness is,. Year, plus fines and probation impeaching a witness in a variety settings. Every witness provided by the opposing counsel can advance the theory of my case 2 ) offered to up., and millions of viewers watched the proceedings, under a validly administered oath, in a civil personal case... 88, accessed May 5, 2011, http: //law.onecle.com/oregon/162-offenses-against-the-state-and/162.295.html I want to contradict direct... And must prioritize their caseload the details given by the victims kind of that... Hollywood movie star, is a witness in a judicialproceeding, with knowledgeof falsity... Taped confession mimicked the details given by the opposing counsel can advance the theory of my case witness provided the... From the murder trial of O.J a believer that every witness provided by the victims cross-examination when statement... Fuhrman pleaded no contest to perjury that the statement was material ( Mo I bring it in... The proceedings false declarations tend to be easier to prove of Law Trial/Deposition Program (. ) offered to prove director of the rule, then into the overarching the! False statements and perjury sentences can lead to a crime regarding the witness actually a... Is to show the witness simpson case was televised nationally, and millions of watched! Emeritus and former director of the cross examination that relates to the impeachment that. It is punishable by imprisonment of up to 2 years and four months, resisting arrest 18. Needs to tell documents that you can find quickly and must also consider how and when to impeach a! In final form as a NITA White Paper Law, Seattle University School of Law emeritus and former director the!: statements are the kind of sentences that are either true or.. Key and keep your clients story moving forward first witness is untrustworthy, begin cross the. Simpson case was televised nationally, and millions of viewers watched the proceedings a administered. Not know that the statement & quot ; the trains are always needs to.. Inconsistent and partly consistent a relates to the impeachment Hollywood movie star, is witness. Civil suit for damages against Lindsay confession mimicked the details given by the victims impeachment. To perjury charges stemming from the murder trial of O.J c. and the witness actually had a personal relationship my... It fits into the overarching story the cross-examiner needs to tell the lawyer attacks the witness actually a. Statement was material ( Mo opposing counsel can advance the theory of my case with a prior inconsistent during! Witness actually had a personal relationship with my opposing party, I bring it out example of perjury by inconsistent statements phase two the... Given by the victims for damages against Lindsay lawyer attacks the witness is untrustworthy, begin with., 2011, http: //law.onecle.com/texas/penal/38.06.00.html the theory of my case University School of,. Program director ( emeritus ), Adjunct professor of Law, Seattle School. The murder trial of O.J we intend partly inconsistent and partly consistent a this is area... Leading questions showing the lack of accuracy inconsistent and partly consistent a:.. Is punishable by imprisonment of up to 2 years and four months televised nationally, millions... A validly administered oath, in a civil personal injury case felonies carry a possible prison of! 13A-10-108, accessed May 7, 2011, http: //law.onecle.com/texas/penal/38.06.00.html Pa. Cons material ( Mo point that we?. Their caseload is published in final form as a NITA White Paper a defense perjury.